Wilson Feng examines the California Office of Tax Appeals decision (Appeal of R. Peters, OTA Case No. 22019564), where the taxpayer appealed the Franchise Tax Board’s determination that they were a California resident during the audit years. The Office of Tax Appeals affirmed the Franchise Tax Board’s residency determination, ruling that the taxpayer had not properly severed ties with California and failed to establish sufficient ties in Nevada.
| less than a minute read
No Joke. California Office of Tax Appeals Rules Against Comedian in Residency Dispute

/Passle/6826f183e520855b61edd449/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-15-21-34-30-010-69407ee6986c138eb56d41f4.jpg)
/Passle/6826f183e520855b61edd449/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-15-15-54-31-187-69402f376b04b88e2d8a6e40.jpg)

/Passle/6826f183e520855b61edd449/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-20-59-25-343-69276a2da118f73e6a3fdeb4.jpg)